The December 2024 Non-transportable cattle symposium brought together representatives from the dairy industry, slaughter industry, veterinary services and government around a recurring problem: cattle that are no longer transportable but are still offered for transport to the slaughterhouse. In trade terms, this is referred to as "non-transportable animals". In practice, it is about animal welfare, risk of violations and practical dilemmas for entrepreneurs.
The common conclusion: nobody benefits from an animal that suffers unnecessarily. Yet it is not easy to act timely and correctly within the frameworks of laws and regulations, economic pressures and logistical constraints.
A dairy cow that stands up poorly after calving. A bovine that does not recover sufficiently after treatment. An animal that is producing but no longer mobile. Every livestock farmer knows these situations. The key question: Is transport still justified, or should the animal be euthanised in the yard?
European regulations (Regulation 1/2005) are clear on paper: animals that cannot walk unaided or have serious injury or pain cannot be transported. In practice, the interpretation is less clear, and the moment of intervention is often delayed.
For dairy farmers, the trade-off is complex. Intervening too early means loss of slaughter value and high destruction costs. Waiting too long increases the chance that the animal will still be rejected, or that transport will lead to welfare damage - with legal or financial consequences. Moreover, there is a lack of uniform assessments: vets, transporters and inspection bodies apply different standards.
On top of this, logistics are becoming increasingly challenging. Since the disappearance of many regional slaughterhouses, entrepreneurs are more often reliant on large-scale locations further away. This means longer travel times, higher stress levels for the animal, and less flexibility in planning.
When an animal is transported unfairly, there are consequences for several parties:
Several solution approaches emerged during the symposium:
A striking outcome was the broad support for strengthening regional slaughtering facilities. Since 2000, the number of small-scale, CoVo Group 3 slaughterhouses has fallen from over 210 to 82 farms - a contraction of 61 %. [NVWA Register of approved slaughterhouses 2001; NVWA 'Tables book of small slaughterhouses and WBIs 2023'; WUR report 2023-126]
Large-scale slaughter sites are less able to facilitate these specific issues - weak or less mobile animals. A recent WUR study (2024) highlights the importance of regional capacity for both animal welfare and flexibility in the chain.
Dealing with non-transportable cattle requires clear choices, clear cooperation and support at logistics and decision-making level. For slaughterhouses and meat processors, it is important to take these signals seriously, fine-tune protocols with chain partners, and take a critical look at logistical bottlenecks. This not only prevents animal suffering, but also limits economic damage and reputation risks.
Sources
